Eight questions. One score (0–100). Three personalized fixes ranked by impact. Find out where your enrollment is silently leaking families and revenue — and exactly what to do about it. No email required.
0 of 8 answered
“Active” means families you’d still offer a spot to today.
How fresh and accurate your active waitlist actually is — and whether you can trust the numbers you make decisions from.
Whether parents can check their own status without calling you — the single biggest determinant of waitlist ghosting rates.
How early you see a seat opening — and whether you fill it in days or weeks, which compounds into thousands per month.
How many hours a week the waitlist is taking from the work that actually grows your center.
A childcare center is only as full as its enrollment pipeline. When the pipeline leaks — ghost families on a stale list, slow follow-up, missed transitions, no forecasting — the center quietly bleeds tuition that never shows up on a P&L because the seats look like they're “just turning over.”
The eight questions in this diagnostic each map to a specific operational pattern that consistently predicts whether a center fills empty seats in days or weeks. Centers in the top tier (80+) typically run at 90–95% occupancy and spend under an hour a week on waitlist admin. Centers below 50 typically run at 75–85% occupancy and spend 5–10 hours a week on it — which works out to roughly $1,000 per month in lost tuition for every empty seat that takes two extra weeks to fill.
The score isn't the point. The point is that every fix that raises your score also recovers real revenue. Take the two minutes — the upside is concrete.
It’s a 0–100 score based on eight questions about how you currently run your enrollment pipeline — waitlist size and freshness, parent visibility, forecasting, fill speed, classroom transitions, priority tracking, and weekly admin time. Each question maps to a specific operational signal that’s been shown to predict how much tuition revenue a center is leaving on the table. The score takes 2 minutes to calculate and surfaces your three highest-impact fixes.
Each of the eight questions is worth 12.5 points (the highest-quality answer earns the full 12.5; lower-quality answers earn proportionally fewer). Your score is the sum across all eight, rounded to the nearest whole number out of 100. Scores of 80+ are “Healthy,” 50–79 are “At Risk,” and below 50 are “Bleeding Revenue.” We also surface your three lowest-scoring areas as personalized fixes so you know exactly where to start.
Anything 80 or above means you’re running enrollment the way the best-managed centers do — self-service parent portal, automated check-ins, DOB-driven forecasting, formal priority tiers. The typical untracked spreadsheet-based waitlist scores around 42. Most centers we’ve seen sit between 40 and 65. The good news: every fix that moves you up the score also recovers measurable tuition revenue, so the path to a higher score is also the path to a fuller center.
Two minutes if you know your numbers, four if you have to estimate. There are eight multiple-choice questions — no typing, no math. You see your score and personalized fixes immediately on the same page. No email required.
No. The assessment runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is saved, nothing is emailed, nothing is shared. You can close the tab and your answers vanish. We deliberately built it this way so you can answer honestly and share the link with other directors without worrying about being added to a list.
Yes — take a screenshot of the results page. The score, tier, and three fixes are designed to be a one-page document you can hand to a board, owner, or business partner to make the case for investing in better enrollment infrastructure. Each fix links to a deeper resource so the case is self-justifying.